Weather | Traffic | Surf | Maps | Webcam


   
 
Forums Visitors Guide Shopping Classifieds Autos Homes Jobs Entertainment Sports Today's Paper Home

 News
 Metro | Latest News
 North County
 Temecula/Riverside
 Tijuana/Border
 California
 Nation
 Mexico
 World
 Obituaries
 Today's Paper
 AP Headlines
 Business
 Technology
 Biotech
 Markets
 In Depth
 Iraq / Afghanistan
 Pension Crisis
 Special Reports
 Video
 Multimedia
 Photo Galleries
 Topics
 Education
 Features
 Health | Fitness
 Military
 Politics
 Science
 Solutions
 Opinion
 Columnists
 Steve Breen
 Forums
 Weblogs
 Communities
 U-T South County
 U-T East County
 Solutions
 Calendar
 Just Fix It
 Services
 Weather
 Traffic
 Surf Report
 Archives
 E-mail Newsletters
 Wireless | RSS
 Noticias en Enlace
 Internet Access

 Sponsored Links

Report: Nurses convicted of crimes remain licensed


ASSOCIATED PRESS

4:59 a.m. October 4, 2008

LOS ANGELES – California's nursing board failed to yank or restrict the licenses of dozens of nurses who have criminal convictions for years before it acted against them in a state that has the largest number of registered nurses in the nation, it was reported Saturday.

A joint investigation by the Los Angeles Times and ProPublica, a nonprofit news organization found that some nurses – about 115 – were only flagged by the state agency after they racked up three or more criminal convictions. Twenty-four nurses had at least five, according to the newspaper.

In other instances, hospitals and clinics that want to do background checks on possible candidates found that some nurses had a clean record, according to the California Board of Registered Nursing, despite being convicted of a crime.

“I'm completely blown away,” said Julianne D'Angelo Fellmeth, administrative director of the Center for Public Interest Law at the University of San Diego and an expert on professional licensing boards in California. “Nurses are rendering care to sick people, to vulnerable people. . . . This is a fundamental failure on the part of this board.”

A top nursing board official said her agency is taking the findings seriously but was unable to say why individual cases were missed.

“We're just really putting our arms around the issue,” said Heidi Goodman, the board's assistant executive director. “It's important. It's vital. It is what we do. That's our mandate: Public protection.”

Among those who skirted the system was a nurse from Redding who had 14 convictions since 1996, a year after she received her license; an Orange County man who renewed his nursing license for years even after he was imprisoned for attempted murder; and a San Pedro man who had various convictions before the board put him on probation.

The agency's screening process also may be flawed in two ways. About 146,000 nurses weren't required to get fingerprinted because the state starting doing so in 1990 after they had received their licenses. The state does not ask nurses to disclose criminal convictions that occurred since the last time they applied – a process that occurs every two years.

Even California's vocational nursing board, which oversees nurses with a lesser degree of training, requires renewing nurses to report convictions. California's registered nurses are asked only to pay a fee and verify that they have completed continuing education courses.

  

Information from: Los Angeles Times, www.latimes.com


 Sponsored Links







Quicklinks
Restaurants Bars
Hotels Autos
Shopping Health
Eldercare Singles
Business Listings
Free Newsletters


Guides
Vegas Spas/Salon
Travel Weddings
Wine Old Town
Baja Catering
Casino Home Imp.
Golf SD North
Gaslamp


© Copyright 1995-2008 Union-Tribune Publishing Co. • A Copley Newspaper Site